BUILDER ACTIVITY · PUBLIC SNAPSHOT

What I’m building, testing, and considering.

This is the project layer behind the portfolio: timelines, current evidence gates, observed public updates, and selected ideas that have not become products yet. It shows state—not code volume or a productivity score.

CURRENT SNAPSHOT

A dated view of public work.

Project timelines
4Evidence-based public project streams
Current gates
4One visible current milestone per timeline
Observed updates
59Returned public commit records in the sampled window
Ideas in view
4Selected concepts, not delivery commitments

PROJECT TIMELINES / 01

Progress is a sequence of evidence gates.

A documented milestone is not the same as a finished product. Each timeline separates what exists, what is current, what comes next, and what remains a later possibility.

01

Active prototype

Road Kernel

Last public update observed
  1. Present

    Source and test foundation recorded

    The repository contains Swift source, unit-test sources, XcodeGen configuration, architecture and risk documentation, setup instructions, and operational diagnostics.

  2. Current

    Mac and Xcode validation gate

    The source still needs full compilation and test validation on a Mac with Xcode before it can be treated as a running product.

  3. Next

    Simulator and paired-device verification

    Run the documented mock-data, pairing, diagnostic, and paired-device flows and record concrete failures and results.

  4. Later

    OBD and safe field trials

    Replace the architectural OBD stub, then evaluate real-device behavior and safe interaction under controlled field conditions.

02

Research prototype

Social Memory Vault

Last public update observed
  1. Present

    Inspectable retrieval core

    An in-memory sparse graph-vector implementation, deterministic hashing embedder, explanations, demo, and diffusion-math tests exist.

  2. Current

    Prototype boundary made explicit

    The current implementation remains local, lexical, in-memory, and intentionally separate from production database or service claims.

  3. Next

    Persistence and embedding adapters

    Add a storage adapter and evaluate a real local or hosted embedding model through the existing interface boundary.

  4. Later

    Benchmarks and governed access

    Compare retrieval quality and latency with vector-only baselines, then explore provenance, conflict handling, expiration, and controlled MCP access.

03

MVP

CyberSim

Last public update observed
  1. Present

    Bounded defensive simulation MVP

    The static app models propagation, patching, segmentation, quarantine, and a visible event log entirely with in-memory objects.

  2. Current

    Safety boundary remains visible

    The teaching environment performs no real networking, file access, cryptography, exploitation, payload generation, or command-and-control traffic.

  3. Next

    Terminal and blue-team lessons

    Add a fake terminal and defensive scripting exercises that operate only against the simulated environment.

  4. Later

    Composable lesson scenarios

    Explore drag-and-drop block ordering and shareable lessons without weakening the no-I/O boundary.

04

Research scaffold

Governed Agent Runtime

Last public update observed
  1. Present

    Research scaffold established

    Definitions, invariants, draft schemas, threat models, evidence, executable test cases, and repository quality gates are present; no production runtime is claimed.

  2. Current

    Freeze the decision model

    Define the smallest ontology and authority-preserving decision process around the invariant that learning may change competence, not authority.

  3. Next

    Falsifiable invariants and stable schemas

    Expand negative tests and stabilize the WorldDelta, Capability, PolicyDecision, Experience, and Skill protocol objects.

  4. Later

    Deterministic runtime, then model adapter

    Build a model-free reference runtime before adding a replaceable language-model adapter and comparisons with baseline approaches.

PUBLIC BUILD SIGNAL / 02

A GitHub-like signal, with the limits left visible.

The grid records observed updates in an allowlisted set of public repositories. Private work, offline research, and unobserved history are absent by design.

Captured from public GitHub repository data on August 11, 2026. Dates use the UTC day from each returned commit's created_at timestamp. The snapshot contains at most the 20 most recent commits returned for each of six public repositories, counts repository updates including merges, and is not a complete contribution total. Private repositories and private activity are excluded.
View the 17 active dates as a list
  1. 1 observed public update · governed-agent-runtime
  2. 2 observed public updates · Road-Kernal, governed-agent-runtime
  3. 1 observed public update · Social-Memory-Vault
  4. 10 observed public updates · Social-Memory-Vault, governed-agent-runtime
  5. 1 observed public update · simComp
  6. 2 observed public updates · Road-Kernal, Social-Memory-Vault
  7. 1 observed public update · Road-Kernal
  8. 3 observed public updates · simComp
  9. 1 observed public update · Road-Kernal
  10. 1 observed public update · Road-Kernal
  11. 4 observed public updates · Road-Kernal
  12. 5 observed public updates · Road-Kernal
  13. 6 observed public updates · EmailInjestEngine, ctm-App26
  14. 2 observed public updates · Social-Memory-Vault
  15. 2 observed public updates · ctm-App26
  16. 1 observed public update · ctm-App26
  17. 16 observed public updates · ctm-App26

RECENTLY OBSERVED

Latest public changes in the snapshot

  1. governed-agent-runtime

    The public research scaffold added its first audit-event contract for authority-preserving runtime evidence.

    Inspect public commit: spec: define Audit Event Contract v0.1 (#3) (opens the public commit in a new tab)
  2. Road-Kernal

    The project documentation was refreshed to keep its current prototype boundary and validation gates visible.

    Inspect public commit: Merge pull request #2 from ctm-26/chatgpt/portfolio-readme-refresh (opens the public commit in a new tab)
  3. Social-Memory-Vault

    The Signal Contract package received schema resources, acceptance coverage, and wheel verification.

    Inspect public commit: Harden Signal Contract packaging and verification (opens the public commit in a new tab)

IDEAS UNDER CONSIDERATION / 03

The idea queue shows questions, not promises.

These concepts come from public project boundaries and roadmaps. Each needs a smaller proof before it earns a larger implementation.

01prototype scaffold

Inbox Kernel provider boundary

A local-first SwiftUI and SwiftData framework currently turns mock inbox messages into reviewable structured records; it does not connect to Gmail.

Next evidence question

Can a read-only provider integration preserve source links, review queues, and the no-auto-send or auto-delete defaults?

Inspect EmailInjestEngine README (opens in a new tab)
02exploring

Controlled memory access

Social Memory Vault already exposes an inspectable local retrieval model; controlled service access is listed as a possible next step.

Next evidence question

What is the smallest MCP boundary that preserves provenance, conflict handling, expiration, and explicit access controls?

Inspect Social Memory Vault README (opens in a new tab)
03queued

Road telemetry adapter

Road Kernel reserves an OBD source slot, but the current source is only architectural scaffolding and does not decode vehicle data.

Next evidence question

Which narrow, safely testable telemetry slice would justify moving beyond the stub without turning the prototype into a driving distraction?

Inspect Road Kernel README (opens in a new tab)
04queued

Shareable CyberSim lessons

CyberSim's public roadmap includes composable block ordering and shareable lesson scenarios inside its in-memory defensive sandbox.

Next evidence question

How can lesson sharing remain expressive while guaranteeing that every action stays simulated and produces no real payload or network traffic?

Inspect CyberSim README (opens in a new tab)

TOOLS IN THE WORKFLOW / 04

The tools are visible. The judgment stays human.

GitHub supplies public source evidence. Codex supports parts of the build process. Neither activity volume nor tool use substitutes for requirements, testing, review, or an honest status.

CURATED WORKFLOW PROFILE

Codex in the workflow

Used alongside conventional development tools to help research, implement, test, document, and review practical systems.

  • Repository and architecture inspection
  • Implementation and refactoring
  • Build, browser, and validation support
  • Documentation and evidence review
Active build toolPrepared

This is a curated workflow profile, not a live OpenAI account feed. It intentionally publishes no prompts, task transcripts, private paths, token totals, or account-level usage.

Public-source policy: private repositories, prompts, transcripts, account identifiers, and invented usage totals are excluded before publication.

FROM IDEA TO EVIDENCE

See the systems behind the activity.

The selected-work page explains the problem, boundary, implementation, evidence, and remaining work for each featured system.